The director of a powerful financial watchdog said Thursday that she asked the Supreme Court to strip her immunity from President TrumpDonald John TrumpSchiff: Bolton ‘refused’ to submit affidavit on Trump’s involvement in Ukraine controversy Yang congratulates Romney for ‘voting his conscious and character’ in convicting Trump McConnell ‘disappointed’ by Romney impeachment vote, but ‘I’m going to need his support’ MORE to settle “uncertainty” lingering over the agency.
Kathy Kraninger, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), said Thursday that she is supporting a legal challenge to the bureau before the Supreme Court in order to resolve questions about the agency’s structure.
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in March on Seila Law vs. CFPB, a lawsuit that accuses the bureau of being unconstitutional because it infringes upon the president’s authority.
Kraninger and the Trump administration filed a brief in September asking the Supreme Court to strip a provision from the Dodd-Frank Act, which created the CFPB, that protects her from being fired at-will by the president.
Under Dodd-Frank, the president may only fire the CFPB director “for cause,” which is generally understood to be misconduct or incompetence.
“Congress obviously provided a clear mission for this agency, but there are some questions around this and I want the uncertainty to be resolved,” Kraninger said in testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.
“I would very much like to see a resolution on this question because it has hampered the CFPB and its ability to carry out its mission virtually since its inception.”
The financial services industry and its allies in Congress have sought to curb the CFPB’s immense power and independence since the agency opened in 2011. Designed by Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenWarren: Male candidates who think they are better positioned to beat Trump are wrong 2020 candidates condemn Senate for acquitting Trump, set sights on election On The Money: Pro-union bill draws 2020 battle lines | Companies added 291,000 jobs last month: survey | Warren touts Obama’s 2010 praise for consumer bureau MORE (D-Mass.), the CFPB was created to regulate and investigate banks, lenders and credit card companies for abusive and fraudulent practices.
Under former director Richard CordrayRichard Adams CordrayNew Warren ad touts Obama’s 2010 praise for consumer bureau Over two-thirds back 36 percent cap on loan interest rates: poll House chairwoman backs interest rate cap on payday loans MORE (D), the CFPB wrote strict regulations and pursued probes of firms they suspected of violating consumer protection laws. When the CFPB asked Seila Law in 2017 to provide information about its sale of debt relief services, the firm rejected the bureau’s request and claimed it lacked the legal authority to do so.
After a district court ruled in favor of the CFPB and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling, Seila Law appealed the case to the Supreme Court, which agreed in October to take up the case.
Democratic lawmakers and consumer groups have urged the Supreme Court to rule against Seila Law and fear that right-leaning justices could shut down the entire agency. Even so, Seila Law and the Trump administration have asked the Supreme Court to settle the constitutional issue by making the CFPB director fireable at will.
A panel of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a similar 2016 case that the CFPB’s structure violated the constitution as long as the director could only be fired for cause.
But the full circuit court reversed that decision, authored by eventual Supreme Court Justice Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughManchin will vote to convict Trump Tlaib says mention of Kavanaugh was ‘trigger’ to walk out of Trump speech Pressley says ‘the cruelty is the point’ for Trump in response to speech MORE, in 2018, clearing the CFPB’s structure.
- NAB asked to probe Quetta utility chief
- Urgent appeal for volunteers at Great Yarmouth’s Citizens Advice Bureau
- MSP Bob Doris to help open new Citizen's Advice Bureau in North Glasgow today
- Poles reject ‘totally unacceptable’ EU power market reform
- Are women better drivers than men? 13 motoring myths and misunderstandings explained
- Review: Sex and power make for a heady mix in Red Sparrow
- Historic meeting lauds lifetime power for Xi
- 80mph limit 'will cost £1bn a year'
- Joint venture: Hubco, Fauji Fertilizer to set up coal-fired power plant
- Balloki power plant: First fire test of gas turbine completed in record time
- Durham chief constable blasts Police Scotland for “secrecy” and “ineptitude” over Emma Caldwell spy probe
- Health chiefs hire admin workers to give nurses more time on wards
- Surge in support for tourist tax in Edinburgh for 'inconvenience and disruption'
- Internet companies are enabling paedophiles, warns police chief
- Fight for control of US consumer watchdog, White House stands firm on its pick
- Facebook wins EU court fight against class action lawsuit
- Power companies directed to provide new connections
- Apple execs face jail in France after lawsuit over slowing down iPhones
Consumer bureau chief explains support for lawsuit limiting her power have 825 words, post on thehill.com at February 6, 2020. This is cached page on Auto News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.